PGB Architectural Services Ltd - Preston

Address: 12 Glen Ave, Knowle Green, Preston PR3 2ZQ, United Kingdom.
Phone: 1254820092.

Specialties: Architectural designer.
Other points of interest: Wheelchair-accessible car park.
Opinions: This company has 1 reviews on Google My Business.
Average opinion: 1/5.

📌 Location of PGB Architectural Services Ltd

☎️1254820092

PGB Architectural Services Ltd is a well-established architectural firm located at 12 Glen Ave, Knowle Green, Preston PR3 2ZQ, United Kingdom. The company has been serving clients in the architectural design industry for many years. Their phone number is 1254820092, which clients can use to contact the firm for inquiries or consultations.

The architectural firm specializes in architectural designer services. This means that they are experts in creating and designing various architectural projects such as residential homes, commercial buildings, and even public spaces. They have a team of skilled professionals who are knowledgeable in the latest architectural trends and techniques.

One of the key features of PGB Architectural Services Ltd is their wheelchair-accessible car park. This ensures that clients with mobility issues can easily access the firm's premises without any inconvenience. This amenity demonstrates the company's commitment to providing a comfortable and accessible environment for all clients.

Regarding reviews, PGB Architectural Services Ltd has received one review on Google My Business. The company's average opinion rating is 1/5. It is essential to consider this information when evaluating the firm's performance and client satisfaction. However, it is also crucial to note that the review is based on a single client's experience, which may not be representative of the overall customer satisfaction level.

👍 Reviews of PGB Architectural Services Ltd

PGB Architectural Services Ltd - Preston

Bombus B.

1/5

I have no experience of employing this company to undertake any work. However, the proprietor did plan and design the demolition and rebuilding of the property next door to me. He also acted as the agent for the planning application

The new property was significantly enlarged and designed to within approximately half a metre of a long stone wall owned by myself. This was in itself a poor piece of design. Unfortunately, the planning application that was submitted failed to show ‘before and after’ ground levels adjacent to my property. Despite what turned out to be hollow promises to protect the amenity of local residents within the submitted planning application, significant and extensive ground excavation occurred next to my property. This was not shown on the submitted planning application. It led to extensive collapse of my stonewall. There was no attempt to follow the provisions of the Party Wall Act, which is designed to protect people like me in these situations.

Unfortunately, protracted negotiations could not resolve this issue and legal action appeared to be the only solution. The proprietor himself pressed me for a meeting to discuss the issues on site (overly so in my view). Unfortunately, when I met him he offered no solution but instead agreed to discuss the matters with the new owners and to come back to us. We never heard from him again. Events were then overtaken by a critical illness, brought on by the extreme and prolonged stress of the situation. Ultimately, I paid for the reconstruction of a new wall, including an expensive retaining wall to hold back my land due to the excavation caused by the new development and its design.

The proprietor and company do not appear on the register of architects overseen by the Architects Registration Board. In the words of the ARB: ‘members of the public can check they are dealing with a genuine qualified professional’ through this register’. There is an Architects Code and Code of Professional Conduct for architects (latter overseen by the Royal Inst of British Architects). Although these are clearly not binding to those not registered as an architect, they do provide an indication of the professional conduct one might expect and it is worth noting that the conduct outlined above falls very short of these professional standards.